Showing posts with label Goethe's "Wilhelm Tell". Show all posts
Showing posts with label Goethe's "Wilhelm Tell". Show all posts

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Goethe's "Wilhelm Tell" Again

I misspoke in my last post: Nicholas Boyle does mention that Goethe saw material for a new work in the Wilhelm Tell story. Concerning the 1797 trip to Switzerland Boyle writes; "Goethe came down from the mountains back into the world of literature." He visited more "Tell sites" on Lake Lucerne. Tell, as Goethe noted in Tag- und Jahreshefte 1804, would be "a sort of Demos," personifying the power of the people, and Gessler would "represent the individual nature of arbitrary rule."

What Goethe really wanted to deal with at this time, according to Boyle, was "the relation of an individual life to a great and violent historical upheaval, a struggle for political liberation ..." Goethe was stymied, and, indeed, one has to recognize that he never learned to say "what it meant to live in his unprecedented times." Boyle ascribes this inability to not knowing "who he was addressing," i.e., who his public was. The literary market had changed considerably since the success of Werther and Götz, and Goethe was unwilling to write for the new popular tastes.

Boyle goes on: "Goethe made several attempts in 1799 ... to circumvent the mysterious obstacle that was preventing him from producing the major work in response to the [French] Revolution which was his ultimate aim." As Friedrich Schlegel wrote: "the French Revolution, Fiche's philosophy, and Goethe's Wilhelm Meister" were "the significant trends" of this new age. Despite this perception -- especially the comparison of political and philosophical revolutions -- Boyle does not believe that Schlegel, or the Jena Romantic circle generally, showed the sense of history that marked Hegel or Hölderlin at this time, and "certainly no sense of historical 'Fate.'"

Picture credits: Gudrun Zapf von Hesse

Friday, March 26, 2010

Goethe's "Wilhelm Tell"

In my last post I mentioned that Goethe re-ascended the Gotthard on his aborted 1797 trip to Italy. The head of the road to the pass is the village of Altdorf, the capital of the canton of Uri and the birthplace of the expert marksman Wilhelm Tell. As Nicholas Boyle writes in his biography of Goethe, this was "the heart of the Swiss national legend," namely, the rebellion of the Swiss against Habsburg tyranny and the formation of the Swiss Confederation in the late 14th century. On his trip Goethe visited the Rütli meadow, where the oath against tyranny was taken, and he stopped at the chapel from which Tell had sprung to freedom. Goethe had recently completed the small epic Hermann und Dorothea, which perhaps inspired him to consider another epic on a "folk" subject. He wrote to Schiller that the story of Tell offered possibilities for an epic handling.

Much later Goethe told Eckermann that the "magnificent and glorious natural setting" of the Vierwaldstätter See (i.e., Lake Lucern, or the Lake of the Four Forested Cantons) had so moved him that he wanted to give it poetic form. In order to endow the setting with more charm and life, he thought of populating it with "significant human figures" (bedeutenden menschlichen Figuren). He also related to Eckermann that he described his impressions to Schiller in whom "my scenery and figures took dramatic shape. ... And since I had other things to do and kept postponing my intention to write about it, I finally handed over the subject to Schiller, who went on to write his admirable poem."

Interestingly, Boyle does not mention any of this in his biography. Rüdiger Safranski, however, in his book on the Goethe-Schiller friendship, discusses it at length, and he also writes that the matter was more complicated than described by Goethe. Schiller was already acquainted with the Tell legend, since several Tell dramas had been staged in the second half of the 18th century. Schiller's fiancé read Johannes von Mueller's History of the Swiss Confederation in March 1789 and recommended the theme to Schiller: "The history of free men is doubly interesting, because it is they who fight with more enthusiasm for their constitution." Schiller didn't follow Charlotte's suggestion, being more occupied, writes Safranski, with his "heroes from the flatland," i.e., his history of the Netherlands.

Schiller, however, was "as if electrified," when Goethe wrote to him. It was as if it was necessary for Goethe to approach the subject for Schiller to recognize its poetic possibilities. He seems to have begun to adapt it mentally, and in March 1802, after completing The Bride of Messina, he began to work on the Tell drama. He informed Goethe in a letter of his new dramatic plan, without, however, mentioning the name of the subject. Thus, exactly when Goethe "handed over" the subject to Schiller is unclear.

Next time I will write a bit about "Schiller's Wilhelm Tell." Stay tuned.

Picture credits: Adventure-Archive; Snak